Regulatory agencies may view companies that do not comply with such “voluntary” standards as out of compliance in enforcement actions, and juries may view them as negligent in tort actions.
In this Thanksgiving week, I depart from my usual format, and look forward to the 2018 election. While I expect Republicans to take a drubbing in total votes cast, the peculiar circumstances of this election indicate that Republicans will probably maintain control of the House, although with a smaller majority, and actually gain seats in […]Read more "The 2018 Election and Its Impact"
Approximately one year ago, Donald Trump won the presidential election. How does the Trump/Pruitt EPA record match up with the predictions that I made? It appears that several trends that I predicted are indeed occurring. Perhaps most importantly, while the EPA is rolling back some significant regulations, and is emphasizing stories over enforcement statistics, the […]Read more "Election Anniversary: Regulatory Rollback, Stories Over Statistics, and Pressure for Local Enforcement"
ExxonMobil, a company not afraid to fight the federal government (See last week’s Alert), has agreed to a multi-million dollar settlement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (“LDEQ”) over allegations of improper operation and inadequate monitoring of flares. Federal […]Read more "Focus on Flares: ExxonMobil Agrees to Multi-Million Dollar Settlement"
When agency regulations require that a company employ a process for detecting and responding to threats of leaks, the company satisfies those regulations by employing that process in good faith, even if doing so failed to prevent a serious accident. An agency’s after the fact criticisms of how the company employed the process will not […]Read more "ExxonMobil’s Good Faith Consideration of Required Factors Defeats PHMSA Order"
Even though state and federal regulations place the duty to secure loads “solely” on the transporter, a company that loaded the truck could still be responsible for a third party’s injuries. That responsibility remained even though the transporter admitted that regulations placed this responsibility on it, and admitted that the company that loaded the material […]Read more "Duty to Avoid Injuring Others Remains, Even When Regulations Place the Duty Solely on Another"
On October 11, 2017, the EPA issued its Record of Decision (“ROD”) selecting the remedy for the San Jacinto River Waste Pits Superfund Site in Harris County, Texas. The proposed remedy calls for excavation and off-site disposal of source materials and contaminated soils from impoundments in and adjacent to the San Jacinto River. The proposed […]Read more "EPA Chooses Removal for the San Jacinto River Waste Pits"