You Can Agree to Make a Contract Electronically Without Explicitly Saying So

In Texas, when the law requires a contract to be in writing, electronic communications can satisfy that requirement, but only if each party agrees to conduct the transaction electronically.  Even when neither party explicitly says that it has agreed to conduct transactions by electronic means, the context and surrounding circumstances can show that that the […]

Read more "You Can Agree to Make a Contract Electronically Without Explicitly Saying So"

Judge Narrows Climate Change Citizen’s Suit, But Allows Key Parts To Go Forward

A suit claiming that an ExxonMobil facility has not adequately planned for severe events such as storm surges, heavy rainfall and flooding can proceed regarding current and near future conditions.  The suit cannot proceed as to longer term issues, such as sea levels predicted for 2050 or 2100, according to a federal judge in Massachusetts. […]

Read more "Judge Narrows Climate Change Citizen’s Suit, But Allows Key Parts To Go Forward"

Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Environmental Cases

The Texas Supreme Court has begun identifying the cases that it will hear in its 2017-2018 term.  One case involves an individual’s personal liability for violating environmental rules; another addresses state pre-emption of local environmental ordinances. Individual Liability of LLC’s Owner and Manager First, the Court agreed to review Morello v. State, where the Austin […]

Read more "Texas Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Two Environmental Cases"

Mitigation and SEPs Under Increased DOJ Scrutiny

Recent action, both governmental and non-governmental, suggests that the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) will be less inclined to include mitigation projects or Supplemental Environmental Projects (“SEPs”) in environmental enforcement settlements. In a prior Alert, I discussed the June 5, 2017 memorandum issued by Attorney General Jeff Sessions (“the Sessions Memo”), which stated that DOJ […]

Read more "Mitigation and SEPs Under Increased DOJ Scrutiny"

Baylor Case: Public Statements Can Waive Privilege

Baylor University was concerned that it was not in full compliance with federal law relating to complaints of sexual harassment and violence. Baylor also expected litigation.  Baylor’s Board of Regents hired the Pepper Hamilton law firm to investigate Baylor’s procedures, policies and other “institutional response” aspects of Baylor’s compliance obligations.  Baylor and Pepper Hamilton agreed […]

Read more "Baylor Case: Public Statements Can Waive Privilege"